Intel Core i5 14400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F: Gaming & Editing Comparison 2025
Intel Core i5 14400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 8400F: A 2025 Showdown for Gamers and Creators
Introduction
In 2025, the mid-range CPU market is more competitive than ever. Intel’s Core i5 14400F and AMD’s Ryzen 5 8400F are two highly anticipated processors designed to deliver solid performance without breaking the bank. In this article, we’ll compare these two chips in terms of gaming, video editing, Adobe software performance, and overall value for money.
Technical Specifications Overview
| Feature | Intel Core i5 14400F | AMD Ryzen 5 8400F |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 4 |
| Cores/Threads | 10 (6P + 4E) / 16 threads | 6 cores / 12 threads |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.7 GHz | 5.0 GHz |
| Cache | 20MB L3 | 32MB L3 |
| TDP | 65W | 65W |
| Integrated GPU | None | None |
| Price (July 2025) | $195 | $180 |
Gaming Performance
In modern AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077, Hogwarts Legacy, and Call of Duty: MW3, the i5 14400F delivers a slightly more consistent frame rate due to its hybrid architecture. With 6 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores, it handles background tasks while maintaining high FPS in-game.
The Ryzen 5 8400F, on the other hand, shines in GPU-heavy games. While it doesn’t have the same number of threads, its strong single-core performance and high boost clock make it competitive, especially when paired with GPUs like the RTX 4060 or RX 7600.
Video Editing and Content Creation
When editing 4K video or rendering in Adobe Premiere Pro, the i5 14400F’s additional threads provide a tangible advantage. Timeline scrubbing is smoother, and render times are about 8-12% faster compared to the Ryzen 5 8400F in most benchmarks.
However, the Ryzen 5 8400F is still a solid choice for casual editors and small YouTubers. Its efficiency and higher base clock make it responsive during basic color grading and timeline adjustments in DaVinci Resolve and Adobe After Effects.
Performance in Adobe Software
Adobe applications such as Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom benefit from high IPC (Instructions Per Clock) and multitasking capabilities. The i5 14400F takes the lead in multitasking scenarios—like batch exporting, while the Ryzen 5 8400F competes well in short bursts of workload, thanks to its high clock speed and cache size.
For users working with Adobe After Effects and Premiere together, the i5 offers better responsiveness when running multiple apps simultaneously.
Thermals and Power Consumption
Both CPUs have a 65W TDP, making them efficient by 2025 standards. Thermal testing shows the i5 14400F runs slightly cooler under load due to the smaller number of high-performance cores constantly active. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 8400F tends to draw slightly more power during peak usage but stays within safe thermal margins with a good air cooler.
Platform and Upgrade Path
The i5 14400F is compatible with LGA 1700 motherboards, offering DDR4 and DDR5 support. Intel’s platform, however, is nearing the end of its lifecycle. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 5 8400F uses AM5 motherboards and supports PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 memory, providing a more future-proof upgrade path.
Price-to-Performance Ratio
With only a $15 price difference, both processors offer incredible value. The i5 14400F provides slightly better multitasking and gaming consistency, while the Ryzen 5 8400F excels in burst performance and long-term upgradeability.
For gamers on a tight budget who don’t plan to upgrade soon, the i5 14400F is arguably the better short-term buy. However, if you’re building a platform for future CPU upgrades, the Ryzen 5 8400F offers a more attractive ecosystem.
Final Verdict
Ultimately, choosing between the i5 14400F and Ryzen 5 8400F comes down to your use case:
· For gaming-focused users: i5 14400F wins in terms of frame consistency and multitasking during gameplay streaming.
· For video editors and Adobe users: i5 again holds a slight edge in multitask-heavy workloads.
· For future-proofing and value: Ryzen 5 8400F provides a more upgradable platform.
Both CPUs are excellent mid-range options, and you won’t go wrong with either in 2025. Your GPU pairing and intended use should guide your final decision.
Keywords: i5 14400F vs Ryzen 5 8400F, gaming CPU 2025, best CPU under $200, Intel vs AMD for Adobe, video editing CPU comparison, Ryzen 8400F performance, i5 14400F benchmark, budget CPUs for creators
About the Author
